During
lunch at school, I like to spend time in the library reading, or on a computer
taking IQ tests. The students there must think I’m strange to be taking IQ
tests all the time. I don’t know why I like doing them, they’re just fun. Like
puzzles, they challenge your mind to find the missing pieces. Unlike puzzles,
they offer more variety, making them more fun. Plus, that ego boost when you
get a high score is always good.
Some of
the online tests are so inaccurate that I can’t take them seriously. On some you
can randomly click on answers and still have your result be higher than 100.
The most popular one is a true-false test that will tell you you’re IQ is 150,
yet you could get a “highly above average” score of 110 just be randomly
clicking the answers. Tests like that should be banned from the internet. The
better ones have at least 5 possible choices per problem and aren’t culturally
biased. These tend to be exclusively visual or mathematical, and I usually to
do better on them.
The
average score on all the tests I’ve taken is about 130. I can usually see a
pattern on all but one or two problems on any given test. And since these tests
are pretty short, I wouldn’t be surprised if my IQ was too high for standard
testing. The highest score I’ve ever gotten is 180, on this really cool
interactive one that was most challenging. There were shapes on this test that
actually moved and changed color- one problem had a whole grid of them.
I
understand that one’s IQ is not the greatest indicator of intelligence, but I
do think it’s the closest we’ve come to testing logical abilities. It should be
called LQ, not IQ, for logicality quotient. IQ makes it sound like it’s the
only true indicator of how intelligent you are, when really it’s only testing
your analytical skills. The thing is people have different skills that make
them smart. I’m sure there’s a social or emotional IQ test out there that I
would probably fail miserably. My EQ would probably tell me I am emotionally
retarded.