Nietzsche's concept of Eternal Recurrence posits that if one has lived a good life, he or she would want to live it over again. In my mind, wanting to live life over again doesn't necessarily mean one has lived it well. Neither does it mean that not wanting to equates with having lived a bad one. There are things that happen to a person which they have no control over. Living a good life is more about adjusting positively to negative influences and not about always making the right decisions, as Nietzsche seems to be assuming. Bad choices are necessary to make better ones; without them we don't learn anything. Regardless, the quality of one's life can't be judged by their personal choices alone.
In my case, I think I have generally made good choices in life, but I would not want to live it over again due to several circumstances which were beyond my control (family life, social pressures, etc).
I'd be willing to bet there are people out there who have led bad lives that would want to live them over again, and other people who have led good lives that wouldn't. A person living a good life likely believes in progress, and if he or she was forced to live their life over again, no progress could be made in the next one. It's only in a next life that they can become better souls, therefore no progress would have been made between lives. Likewise, someone who led a bad life might want to live it over again, because they aren't interested in changing themselves for the better. He or she likely experienced many pleasures at the expense of others or got incredibly lucky by being dealt a wealthy hand. Then again, they may not even be conscious they have led bad lives. As such, they would consider their lives "good" and want to live them over again.
Due to these different contexts, I think the question really depends on the person you're asking. Such a generalization as Nietzche's can't be taken at face value because there are many subjective ideas about life that we don't all agree on.