The Late Bronze Age of the Eastern Mediterranean featured a “golden” age in international trade. Like in today’s world, states engaged in long-distance trade that involved shipments, exchanges, and even embargoes. While staples like grain, bronze, and tin were instrumental in maintaining the structure of civilizations, the importance of prestige items like gold are perhaps more difficult to assign. In this paper I will show where gold came from, where it went and how it got there, and examine its sociocultural role in maintaining the high status of elites.
During the Bronze Age, which lasted from roughly 3300 BC to 1200 BC, gold was increasingly in high demand as international trade networks developed. Egypt was the most important source of it in these exchanges (Cline 54), though lower volumes of it came from Anatolia (Lamberg-Karlovsky 2009:57), where the Hittite, Mittani, and Assyrian empires would have some internal access. Evidence for Egypt being the top source for gold-seekers lies in the Amarna letters, which demonstrate a high demand for it from kings in the region, usually for prestige or as part of gift exchanges (Cline 54-55). Like today, gold was a luxury item, though it had nothing to do with coinage the way it has in the more recent past.
The mines of Nubia were the greatest source of gold for Egyptians (Cline 54). This area, located around the eastern desert of Lower Egypt, was conquered by the Egyptians around 1500 BC, allowing them greater access to gold reserves (Klemm, Klemm, & Murr 2001:649), conveniently at a time when international trade was reaching its peak. Importantly, the authors suggest the most probable etymology of Nubia is “nub”, the Egyptian word for gold at the time. Evidence for gold extraction from this area comes from about 250 excavation sites, where archaeologists have discovered hammers and axes (tools used for milling gold), large settlements housing hundreds of workers, and mineshafts (Klemm, Klemm, & Murr 2001:643). During the New Kingdom, Egyptians were able to refine techniques for procuring gold in panning and the introduction of the bronze chisel, which allowed it to separate from the quartz of host rocks better (Klemm, Klemm, & Murr 2001:653-654). These developments created a huge surplus of gold in the kingdom, every bit as staggering as the surplus of workers needed to erect its towering pyramids centuries before. That surplus became evident after Howard Carter’s excavation of King Tutankhamen’s tomb in 1922, where “everywhere the glint of gold” was found (Cline 61). Such a ravishing display of color and luster that matched the desert sands would have appealed to foreign traders in Egypt, who might have been keen to share it with other kingdoms.
Gold from Nubia was transported north on ships that sailed with the current of the Nile. From the Nile delta on the Mediterranean Sea, it was then distributed to various states in the Near East. The Amarna letters reveal gold was sent by caravan to Babylon (Cline 55), though there is speculation that much of it was robbed or swapped with silver along the way. The letters also provide evidence that the king of Mitanni received gold from Egypt in gift exchanges (Cline 54). To my knowledge, no evidence exists for Egyptian gold being traded farther east than Babylon and Assyria; most of it appears to have stayed within the sphere of the Near East.
Farther west, sailors took gold sent by the Pharaoh Merneptah to Ugarit when there was famine in the city (Cline 155-156). Tablets excavated from Ugarit reveal how wealthy the royal family was. Even before the famine, Egypt was a major source of imports there, as the royal family would send gold to the Hittites farther north as tribute (Cline 100), likely relayed from the Egyptian imports. As Ugarit was a major hub of shipping and trade in the Eastern Mediterranean, Egyptian gold would have had ample opportunities to travel from there. On the Uluburun shipwreck, off the coast of modern Turkey, a gold scarab inscribed with “Nefertiti” was found (Cline 73), suggesting luxury items from Egypt were in circulation around the Mediterranean. Archaeologists suspect most were luxury items due to the gift exchanges revealed by international letters, many which praise “the unending supplies of gold” from Egypt (Feldman 2002:11). Complementing these letters is the fact that most of the gold items found at excavations across the Near East are in fact luxury items. For instance, two gold pendants were found in Ugarit that were made of sheet gold, showing Egyptian females in robes seated on chairs (Feldman 2002:14). There is little evidence for gold nuggets or ingots shipping out of Egypt: the exception being Babylon, where the king would heat up the gold in a kiln to verify its contents (Cline 55). Most of the artifacts found in the Eastern Mediterranean are luxury items that appear to have been made by artisans in Egypt prior to shipping, though some raw material may have been exported for local artisans and manufacturers to manipulate.
Both the luxury items and the raw gold were prominent in gift exchanges between kings, which became the material “contract” by which an ancient Brotherhood flourished. Lamberg-Karlovsky (2009:71) states that this Brotherhood was held together by gift exchanges involving expensive commodities like gold. They were instrumental in the dynastic and cultural exchanges that took place between states during the time, strengthening relationships between trade partners. The great kings of the Late Bronze Age depended on each other for these high-status items and all the personnel that came with them, including craftsmen and wives. Class also played a role, as elites governed the luxury trade for ostentatious display of furnishings in their temples, palaces, and homes (Feldman 2002:19; Lamberg-Karlovsky 2009:62). The overabundance of gold that was discovered in King Tutankhamen’s tomb indicates how prestigious an item it was to have been found in royal burials, at least to Egyptians.
Economically, gold was a boon for this Brotherhood of nations- an international entity that bonded the kings of nations so tightly that friendly exchanges were deemed essential over warfare. According to Podany (10), these kings took the term “brotherhood” quite literally, as their relationships demanded the loyalty expected from real brothers. Included in the Brotherhood were the kings and leaders of Egypt, Babylon, Mitanni, Hatti, and possibly even Greece (Podany 15). Because of this code of loyalty, ambassadors were able to travel safely to capitals; kings negotiated peace treaties; and their relationships could be strengthened by arranged marriages (Podany 10). The peace generated by such stable relationships allowed trade networks to solidify and flourish, thereby increasing the accumulated wealth of kings.
This was an incredibly fertile ground for the Egyptians to disperse their highest luxury commodity through international trade networks. Lamberg-Karlovsky (2009:57) cites the creation of added value the recipients enjoyed as they exchanged commodities for gold. Raw gold that was shipped to urban centers created jobs for artisans and the manufacturers of prestige items. Feldman (2002:8) states that the gold coming through ports like Ugarit generated enormous wealth for locals due to the demand for luxury items. Being that the production of gold was largely initiated by state institutions (Lamberg-Karlobsky 2009:59), it served as a safety net for the preservation of high society in most Near Eastern states. Texts have also been found that highlight the concern over “capitalist” ventures to procure gold in Anatolia (Lamberg-Karlovsky 2009:68) in exchange for staple items like tin, bearing a striking resemblance to modern techniques of accumulating wealth.
The idea of gold representing high status, or the divine right to rule, is not unique to the ancient Near East; for much of recorded history, gold has been the most sought-after item for ostentatious display in royal courts. What’s less certain is the origin of the seemingly universal quality. If it is gold’s resemblance to the color and power of the sun, it follows that many disparate cultures would be attracted by its luster to forge an archetypal color of leadership, especially if that leadership professed to divine authority. The first state to achieve this on a grand scale was likely the Egyptians, who extolled this metal to such miraculous extremes that their sun god Ra was referred to as a mountain of gold, and the gold-emblazoned Pharaohs claimed to be his offspring. The Egyptian model, reinforced by its matching desert landscape, could have been so powerful that it infiltrated other states during the Late Bronze Age, putting gold on the map as a top luxury item reserved for elites.
If that idea survived the end of the Bronze Age, it certainly resonated through the ages in other empires. Gold’s economic significance may be unparalleled when one considers the advantages it provides to any state. That could be why it was important enough to be measured as the standard unit of currency in the U.S. for many years. For the ancient Near East though, gold was more than an economic necessity; it sent a powerful sociopolitical message involving class symbolism, that only those in powerful positions were worthy of its opulence. As the sun powers the Earth, so was gold thought to empower its kings and pharaohs, stabilizing a cordial system of trade between cooperative states.
References Cited
Cline, Eric, 2014, 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Klemm, Dietrich, Rosemarie Klemm, and Andreas Murr, 2001, Gold of the Pharaohs ‐ 6000 years of gold mining in Egypt and Nubia. Journal of African Earth Science, 33, 643–59
Feldman, Marian H., 2002, Luxurious Forms: Redefining a Mediterranean “International Style,” 1400–1200 b.c.e.. The Art Bulletin, 84:1, 6-29
Lamberg-Karlovsky, C.C., 2009, Structure, Agency and Commerce in the Ancient Near East. Iranica Antiqua, 44:0, 47–88
Podany, Amanda, 2020, Brotherhood of Kings: How International Relations Shaped the Ancient Near East. New York: Oxford University Press