Scientists have found that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, but it wasn’t always that way. Six or seven billion years ago, the acceleration had been moderate due to the relatively localized influence of gravity. This changed, however; all of the sudden a critical mass was reached, and anti-gravity took over, allowing for accelerated expansion. I think what happened is that galactic clusters got far enough apart that the dark energy between them formed “anti-gravity holes”, which inverted space-time and overcame the force of attraction between distant clusters.
What does this mean about our universe and the creation of universes in general? My expansion on an earlier black hole theory is that the gravity of galactic clusters in our universe will eventually form supermassive black boles that will be so large that, once critical mass is obtained, our universe will contract because the force all the “big bangs” inside them will be too powerful for the antigravity of dark matter/energy to prevail. The collective pull of these black holes may be so strong that they break apart the “anti-holes” created by dark energy and suck them inside, allowing for space to recycle itself. The direction that these universes will expand in will be internal, meaning they will only expand in higher dimensions. Think of a mobius strip, or a high-dimensional manifold like the Calabi-Yau. Pathways get folded in on one another, and that's what I think is happening on the macrocosmic multiverse scale. It’s possible that all these new universes that are created will create new ones of their own, once their lifespans have run course and the critical masses of their own super-galactic black holes are reached, the result looking much like a distorted fractal mapped on the complex plane. The cycle will go on until, I believe, it comes back to our own dimensional paradigm; then it will begin anew. Size doesn’t matter because the dimensions form pathways to each other, much like how a mobius strip can look like one side being the same side as the other.
I reached this epiphany several times while reading The Hidden Reality by Brian Greene. There’s something called the Landscape Multiverse, which sort of hints at this, except that instead of black holes they call them quantum tunnels. There’s also something called the Holographic Multiverse, which extracts from the fact that black holes store all the information inside them on their surfaces via Planck bits of entropy (to which all the strings in string theory are attached). Hawking proved mathematically that at the Event Horizon particles that would normally annihilate each other split up in pairs. The halves that shoot outward form the Hawking Radiation, which is how all the information stored inside a black hole can be translated into a "hologram" on its surface. Once a black hole reaches critical mass, all the information stored on its surface collapses and annihilates with the center like it should have done. This creates a Big Crunch that drags all the antigravity beyond into higher dimensions with the ordinary matter. The holographic principle doesn't just apply to black holes though; it also applies to any gravitational shape. This means that all the information stored in our own universe is reflected on its gravitational boundary. From this idea, can we conclude that our universe exists inside the black hole of some other universe? Maybe. Perhaps there is more mass being added to our universe, not at the boundary but in the singularity beyond visible space. If space-time gets inverted inside a black hole, logically the mass would come from within the center from our perspective and from the outside from the surrounding universe's perspective.
It seems that the more they uncover about the mysteries of quantum theory, the more physics is being cemented on the fanciful notion anything is possible. If there are an infinite amount of recycling universes that all have different cosmological constants, equations of motion, and relativistic time dilation, then why wouldn’t anything be possible?
No comments:
Post a Comment